Why APC Senators Voted Against E-Transfer Of Results Nigeria – information circulated on Wednesday on why senators elected on the platform of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) voted against electronic transmission of election results last week.
Why APC Senators Voted Against E-Transfer Of Results
50 memeber of the APC senators and two of their counterparts in the main opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) voted against the electronic transmission of election results in the forthcoming general elections, a decision that has been widely condemned by Nigerians.
The senators had insisted that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) should be compelled to seek clearance from the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC), while the National Assembly would have to approve the verdict of the NCC.
The Senate while considering the Electoral Act 2010 Amendment Bill, had voted that “the commission (INEC) may consider electronic transmission of results, provided the national coverage is adjudged to be adequate and secure by the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) and approved by the National Assembly.”
While justifying the action of the lawmakers who voted against the bill, Senate President, Ahmad
Lawan, had said that the upper chamber took the decision in defence of about half of the Nigerian voters whose votes may not be counted with immediate deployment or application of electronic transmission of election results.
Click to watch BB9JA SEASON 6 CLICK HERE
However, speaking exclusively with Daily Independent on Wednesday, one of the senators from the South- West, who was in Lagos for the Sallah break, said they jointly took the decision because they believe that Nigeria is not yet ripe for electronic voting and transmission of results.
While denying reports that the national leadership of the party or the presidency mandated them to vote against the report, the ranking lawmaker said prior to the division between the APC and PDP lawmakers, the APC lawmakers had earlier agreed that they were not in support of electronic voting as it is susceptible to being hacked.
He said the system can easily be manipulated that the votes cast for a candidate in APC can easily be manipulated on the system to go to PDP and vice versa.
“Aside the issue of coverage which was mentioned in the chamber, many of us, including PDP senators believed that computer can be hacked or manipulated in such a way that votes for candidate A can be switched to candidate B. If that happens, how can it be reversed?
“For us, while electronic voting is good, the manual option is still the best for now because like it is done now, people will queue, cast their ballot and it will be recorded and counted on the spot. Everybody sees the result and when it gets to the collation centre, the agents are there to monitor if the results declared at the polling centres are tampered with. You can’t do that with electronic voting.
“There is nothing that cannot be hacked. If you recall, in 2015, INEC’s website was hacked and I think it was after that that they put a stronger mechanism in place to prevent a future occurrence. So, if it happens now that a computer is hacked into and all the votes for a particular candidate is going to his opponent, how can that be stopped?
“These are the issues a lot of Nigerians failed to understand. Our colleagues in the PDP know these things but they jointly agreed to vote in favour of it so as to score political points because they know that is what many Nigerians want. But you can see that despite that, not even all of them voted for it”, he said.
Speaking with Daily Independent, Jimi Agbaje, former governorship candidate of the PDP in Lagos State, said by their actions, the National Assembly is not interested in deepening democracy in the country.
“No, they didn’t handle the issue of electronic voting well. They have not shown that they are interested in deepening democracy in the country. I can’t even say now this is exactly what their decision was.
“I think it would have been better if they have fears, they should leave it to INEC to decide whether it is applicable or not. If you have a situation where there is 90 percent coverage, you don’t because of 10 percent throw out the entire system. At worst for the 10 percent, you can do manual.
“I strongly believe they should have left it to INEC as an autonomous body to decide whether it is possible or not”, he said.